<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Bad Code is Expensive</title> <atom:link href="http://robknight.net/2007/08/no-web-standards-for-new-palo-alto-website/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://robknight.net/2007/08/no-web-standards-for-new-palo-alto-website</link> <description>Front-end web developer, surfer, runner, and geek.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 00:30:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Rob</title><link>http://robknight.net/2007/08/no-web-standards-for-new-palo-alto-website/comment-page-1#comment-6328</link> <dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:52:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://robknight.net/2007/08/no-web-standards-for-new-palo-alto-website#comment-6328</guid> <description>@Teck64Thank you for coming to read the story. Validation, as I mentioned in the article, is not the panacea for bad web design.However, leaving off a DOCTYPE on a $250,000 site is just irresponsible. I&#039;m sure the people of Palo Alto didn&#039;t want their money spent on a site that sends every browser into quirks mode with pages that fail to render in most advanced browsers currently available (Firefox).This is Silicon Valley, right?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Teck64</p><p>Thank you for coming to read the story. Validation, as I mentioned in the article, is not the panacea for bad web design.</p><p>However, leaving off a DOCTYPE on a $250,000 site is just irresponsible. I&#8217;m sure the people of Palo Alto didn&#8217;t want their money spent on a site that sends every browser into quirks mode with pages that fail to render in most advanced browsers currently available (Firefox).</p><p>This is Silicon Valley, right?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Teck64</title><link>http://robknight.net/2007/08/no-web-standards-for-new-palo-alto-website/comment-page-1#comment-6327</link> <dc:creator>Teck64</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:58:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://robknight.net/2007/08/no-web-standards-for-new-palo-alto-website#comment-6327</guid> <description>your making it a big fucken deal, get over yourself, a lot of pages on the internet don&#039;t validate, big fucken deal.god forbid your code doesn&#039;t display right in certain browsers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your making it a big fucken deal, get over yourself, a lot of pages on the internet don&#8217;t validate, big fucken deal.</p><p>god forbid your code doesn&#8217;t display right in certain browsers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Roger</title><link>http://robknight.net/2007/08/no-web-standards-for-new-palo-alto-website/comment-page-1#comment-6326</link> <dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 04:48:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://robknight.net/2007/08/no-web-standards-for-new-palo-alto-website#comment-6326</guid> <description>Thank you Rob. If a civics lesson may be gleaned from this unfortunate city Web site development I&#039;d like to share it at Wikiversity on this page http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/City_of_Palo_Alto_official_website</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Rob. If a civics lesson may be gleaned from this unfortunate city Web site development I&#8217;d like to share it at Wikiversity on this page <a
href="http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/City_of_Palo_Alto_official_website" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/City_of_Palo_Alto_official_website</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Object Caching 204/217 objects using disk: basic

Served from: robknight.net @ 2012-05-18 09:11:52 -->
