That Damn Clinton

In the post 9/11 world of threat levels and duct tape (I’ve gotmine hanging on a coat rack by the door), it has been a common
occurance to blame Clinton for everything from our ill-preparedness for 9/11 to, say, the Yankees losing the world
series, for which I blame Derek Jeter. But I digress.

So this week, I thought I’d share with you some choice quotes from Clinton years. In August 1998, simultaneous bombings of US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, brought the name Osama bin Laden and Islamic terrorism to American households. Clinton, did nothing. And if you are a Fox News Channel watcher, you not only KNOW Clinton did nothing, you’d have me and my family killed for telling you what I’m about to tell you.

It turns out, Clinton did far more than nothing. I know, because I’m a geek and a big fan of LexisNexis. LexisNexis is an awesome website that lets you search every major news source in the world going back at least 10 years. BONANZA!

I searched for newspapers covering the Clinton response to the 1998 emabssy bombings and turned up the following. (WARNING, if you think Clinton was sucking his thumb when it came to terrorism, you might want to delete this email right now and go turn on Hannity & Colmes. And I’ve got a bridge you might want to buy):

From the Chicago Sun Times, May 23, 1998:

To deal with biological threats, Clinton ordered the development
and unprecedented stockpiling of antibiotics and vaccines –
such as for smallpox and anthrax — for civilians. Further, the
president directed that public health and medical surveillance
systems be upgraded to detect and sound the alarm on any release of bacteria or viruses.

From the Christian Science Monitor July 1, 1998:

Some 40 US agencies and offices are now involved in Clinton’s
antiterrorism efforts, from the CIA and Centers for Disease
Control to the Department of Agriculture.

Since 1995, annual federal antiterrorism spending has climbed
from some $5 billion to almost $7 billion, a record.

Earlier this month, on [Richard] Clarke’s recommendation,
Clinton asked Congress for $ 294 million more, including $ 94
million to create a national stockpile of antidotes and
antibiotics to treat victims of chemical or biological
terrorism.

The efforts are not confined to the federal level. The US Army
has begun a program to train by 2003 first-response teams of
medical, law-enforcement, and disaster-relief personnel in 120
metropolitan areas to detect and contain chemical and biological
attacks. They will also be supplied equipment such as protective
suits.

The Army is also creating 10 National Guard and Reserve teams
around the nation to help handle the aftermath of terrorist
attacks.

From the London Independent, August 30, 1998:

[Rob's note: this article discussed the response of the U.S. to
the embassy bombings.]

The response showed how radically the American approach had
changed, according to officials involved in counter-terrorism.
Henceforth, Washington is pledged to a far more active,
unilateral policy. This, said Sandy Berger, National Security
Advisor, is “the long-term, fundamental way in which the US
intends to combat the forces of terror”. The US, he continued,
“will not play passive defence”.

from The Washington Post, May 23, 1998:

[Clinton]:

“Our security is challenged increasingly by nontraditional
threats from adversaries both old and new,” he said in a
commencement address at the U.S. Naval Academy, “not only
hostile regimes but also terrorist and international criminals
who cannot defeat us in traditional theaters of battle but
search instead for new ways to attack by exploiting new
technologies and the world’s increasing openness.”

from the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette December 19, 1999:

The Clinton administration, which claims a “zero- tolerance”
policy, has aggressively pursued terrorists. U.S. authorities
cracked the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and quickly traced
the African embassy bombings to bin Laden. However
controversial, President Clinton’s decision to bomb suspected
terror sites in Afghanistan and Sudan showed that the United
States would strike back.

“Our effort to strengthen the rule of law against terrorism is
global,” Secretary of State Madeleine Albright told Congress in
February. “At its heart is the message that every nation has a
responsibility to arrest or expel terrorists, shut down their
finances and deny them safe haven.”

Damn that Clinton and his lazy anti-terror policies.

rob

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>